Corporate Man Slaughter

Corporate manslaughter, also known as corporate homicide or corporate killing, refers to the act of a corporation or organisation causing the death of a person due to their negligence, gross negligence, or a serious management failure.

This is a criminal offense that can be charged against a company or organisation, and can result in significant fines, penalties, and other legal consequences.

Corporate manslaughter is often seen as a way to hold corporations accountable for the actions and decisions of their leadership and management. It can be difficult to prove corporate manslaughter, as it requires demonstrating that the company’s actions or failures directly led to a person’s death, and that these actions or failures were a result of gross negligence or serious management failures.

Examples of situations that could lead to charges of corporate manslaughter include a company failing to provide proper safety equipment or training to employees, a construction company failing to properly secure a job site, or a food company failing to properly store and handle food products that result in illness or death.

Corporate manslaughter laws vary by country and jurisdiction, and may be different from other forms of criminal liability. However, they generally aim to hold companies accountable for their actions and decisions, and to ensure that they take appropriate steps to prevent future harm.

Do you rely on staff to attend alarm activations out of hours?


Sending staff to alarm activations can be dangerous and should be approached with caution. Alarm activations can be triggered by a variety of causes, including criminal activity, equipment malfunctions, or false alarms. Depending on the situation, responding to an alarm activation can put staff at risk in several ways, such as:

  1. Physical injury: Responding to an alarm activation may require staff to enter a potentially dangerous or hazardous area, such as a construction site, factory floor, or retail store. Staff may be at risk of physical injury if they encounter dangerous equipment or machinery, trip and fall on uneven surfaces, or encounter dangerous or aggressive individuals.
  2. Exposure to hazards: Depending on the nature of the alarm activation, staff may be exposed to hazardous materials, such as chemicals or fumes, or dangerous environmental conditions, such as fire or flooding.
  3. Security risks: Responding to an alarm activation may put staff at risk of encountering criminals or other individuals who pose a threat to their safety. In some cases, responding to an alarm activation may also be a diversionary tactic used by criminals to distract staff from other criminal activity taking place elsewhere.

To minimise the risks associated with responding to alarm activations, employers should have clear policies and procedures in place for responding to alarms, and should provide staff with proper training, equipment, and resources to do so safely. This may include providing staff with personal protective equipment, such as hard hats or gloves, and ensuring that they are trained on how to respond to different types of alarms and situations. Employers should also consider implementing remote monitoring technologies or outsourcing alarm response to trained security personnel to further minimise the risks associated with responding to alarms.